Philippine politics has never been a quiet affair—but in recent weeks, the noise has grown louder, sharper, and more revealing. Beneath the surface of televised interviews, offhand remarks, and heated online commentary lies a deeper story of ambition, survival, and preparation. At the center of it all are three powerful names: Jonvic Remulla, Vice President Sara Duterte, and Senate President Tito Sotto—with President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. and the ever-watchful Senate majority hovering in the background.
What appears at first glance to be scattered statements and political gossip begins to form a clearer picture when placed side by side: the ruling coalition is tense, the Senate is bracing for turbulence, and 2028—though still years away—is already shaping today’s decisions.
A Senate on Edge: Preparing for the Unthinkable
When Senate President Tito Sotto publicly confirmed that he has been receiving briefings on impeachment rules, evidence, and criminal procedure, it sent a ripple across the political landscape. On paper, the statement was neutral and procedural. In tone, however, it carried weight.
Sotto emphasized that all senators—lawyers or not—must be prepared to sit as judges should an impeachment trial reach the Senate. He made it clear: whether the case involves the President, the Vice President, or any other high-ranking official, the Senate cannot be caught unready.
In a country where impeachment is both a constitutional mechanism and a political weapon, such preparation is never random.
The subtext was impossible to ignore: Vice President Sara Duterte is now part of the serious political conversation around impeachment, whether her allies like it or not.
Impeachment as a Political Storm Cloud
Historically, impeachment in the Philippines is rarely just about legal accountability. It is about timing, alliances, numbers, and narrative control. Senate insiders know that the process is as political as it is judicial.
Sotto’s insistence on readiness reflects a Senate leadership aware of its vulnerability. With a thin margin separating the majority and minority, even a small shift in loyalty could alter outcomes—not just in impeachment, but in leadership itself.
That fragility was exposed during recent internal tensions, when rumors of leadership change circulated, and the word “power-sharing” suddenly entered public discourse.
Though later dismissed as half-joke, half-curiosity, the very idea that Senate leadership could be negotiated speaks volumes about the pressure inside the chamber.

The Quiet Calculus Behind Senate Unity
Veteran Senator Ping Lacson, in a candid interview, peeled back the curtain on how close the Senate came to instability. He described whispered offers, late-night calls, and the emotional toll of political maneuvering—particularly involving Senator Loren Legarda, whose name surfaced repeatedly in takeover rumors.
According to Lacson, Legarda declined overtures to lead a new majority. Still, the fact that she was even approached underscores a deeper truth: the Senate is not as solid as it appears.
Lacson’s remarks framed Senate politics as a “continuing crime”—a perpetual state of attempted rebellion, not against the Constitution, but against leadership itself.
In this environment, impeachment becomes more than a legal process. It becomes leverage.
Enter Jonvic Remulla: A National Figure in the Making?
While the Senate wrestles with internal survival, attention is quietly shifting to Secretary Jonvic Remulla, whose name has increasingly surfaced in discussions about 2028.
In a revealing interview, Remulla neither confirmed nor denied presidential ambitions. Instead, he did something far more strategic: he left the door open.
At just 36 years old, with executive experience both locally in Cavite and nationally as a Cabinet member, Remulla presents a rare political profile—young, visible, and deeply embedded in the Marcos political network.
“I’ve never floated it,” he said of a possible 2028 run. “But I’ve never denied it.”
In Philippine politics, that statement alone is an announcement.
Loyalty, Machinery, and the Marcos Factor
Remulla was blunt about one thing: he would not run without President Marcos’ endorsement.
That admission is crucial. It reveals how much modern Philippine politics still depends on machinery, family alliances, and presidential blessing, rather than ideology alone.
Remulla described his family’s loyalty to the Marcoses as spanning decades—long before 1986. That history matters. Endorsement is not just symbolic; it unlocks networks, resources, and political protection.
Yet it also raises a critical question: What happens if Marcos chooses neutrality—or backs someone else?
For Remulla, that decision may determine whether he advances or retreats.
Sara Duterte: The Unavoidable Axis of Power
No discussion of 2028—or impeachment—can avoid Vice President Sara Duterte.
Despite speculation, criticism, and internal coalition strain, Duterte remains one of the most popular and polarizing figures in Philippine politics. Her base is loyal, emotionally invested, and deeply suspicious of perceived elite maneuvering.
This is precisely why any impeachment move against her would be explosive.
Supporters see such efforts not as accountability, but as political assassination. Critics argue that no official should be above scrutiny.
Caught in between is the Senate—tasked with judging, while knowing that any verdict will reshape the political future of the country.
The Senate’s Dilemma: Judge or Survivor?
Should an impeachment case against Sara Duterte reach the Senate, senators will face an impossible balance:
-
Apply the law fairly, without fear or favor
-
Protect institutional credibility
-
Survive the political backlash—from both the administration and the public
Tito Sotto’s preparations suggest he understands this dilemma all too well. The Senate, he knows, must look competent and impartial—even as politics presses in from all sides.
Scheduling impeachment trials in the afternoon while legislative work continues in the morning may sound procedural, but it also reflects a desire to maintain normalcy amid potential chaos.
Power-Sharing, Loyalty, and Political Fatigue
The recent talk of “term sharing” between Senate leaders—though brushed off as humor—exposed fatigue within the institution. Senators are tired of constant power struggles, media speculation, and internal suspicion.
Yet these dynamics are not accidents. They are symptoms of a system where numbers are tight, trust is fragile, and ambition never sleeps.
In such a climate, even long-time allies can become temporary rivals.
The Bigger Picture: 2028 Starts Now
The truth many politicians avoid saying out loud is simple: the 2028 election has already begun.
Every statement, every interview, every “procedural” preparation is part of a longer game. Impeachment talk influences public perception. Cabinet visibility builds name recall. Senate unity—or lack thereof—signals strength or vulnerability.
Jonvic Remulla’s visibility, Sara Duterte’s looming presence, and Tito Sotto’s defensive readiness are not isolated stories. They are chapters of the same book.
What This Means for Filipinos
For ordinary Filipinos, the stakes are high.
Impeachment proceedings can paralyze governance. Leadership instability affects markets, investor confidence, and public trust. Presidential succession politics often distract from urgent issues—jobs, inflation, disaster response, and public services.
Yet politics cannot be wished away. It must be understood.
What is happening now is not just elite drama—it is the early shaping of the country’s next political era.
A Nation Watching, a Senate Waiting
As of now, there is no confirmed impeachment trial. There is no declared 2028 candidate. But there is preparation, positioning, and pressure.
The Senate stands watchful. The Vice President stands defiant. Potential contenders like Jonvic Remulla stand measured and cautious.
In Philippine politics, silence is rarely neutrality. More often, it is strategy.
And as history has shown time and again, the real battles are usually decided long before the campaign banners go up.
The question is no longer if Philippine politics will heat up—but who will be standing when the temperature finally peaks.